MAOIST.WS

Maoist Information Web Site


Maoist movie reviews

"Godzilla's Revenge" is a good children's movie politically

Godzilla's Revenge
Directed by Ishirô Honda
Toho Company and United Productions of America
Rated G
70 minutes
1971 (1969)

2008 December

A latchkey child named Ichiro dreams of being on Monster Island. The 
dreams influence how he deals with a bully and a couple of bumbling 
bank robbers who have stolen 50 million yen (less than $200,000 in 
early-1970s dollars) and are in the neighborhood. In his dreams, 
Ichiro befriends the son of Godzilla. The younger monster in this 
movie has been compared to a costumed character in a preschool 
children's television show. In one dream, though, Ichiro cheers on 
Godzilla as he wrecks a fleet of hostile jets -- not exactly Barney 
material.

"Godzilla's Revenge" has been maligned up, down and all over the 
place, but it deserves some credit. Many Amerikans actually watched 
this dubbed, U.$. version of "All Monsters Attack" and enjoyed it. 
"Godzilla's Revenge" is an indication of what was possible in 1971.

"Godzilla's Revenge" raises the idea of supporting one's "local 
police," but not the military. This is wrong theoretically speaking, 
but this is not your typical cops-and-robbers movie, and the police 
actually play a small role in this movie. Also, "Godzilla's Revenge" 
is a children's movie, and anything that threatening to an individual 
child belonging to an adult in the First World would probably involve 
the police eventually anyway. Capitalist relations of production and 
the reproduction of those relations intersect with children's 
oppression in various ways in "Godzilla's Revenge" as they do in 
countless movies that depict reality on a small, daily scale, but 
don't deal with theory. 

Most oppressed nationalities and lumpen people in prison for property 
crime convictions are not there for stealing amounts like $150,000, 
though ideas about big-time robbers legitimize police and prison 
repression as a whole. Famously, Stalin robbed banks for the cause, 
but this reviewer doesn't see this movie as being particularly 
relevant to whether or not there is going to be a crackdown on 
bank-robbing revolutionaries. If the cops-and-robbers theme was in a 
way a requirement for having a Godzilla movie for children, the movie 
should have been made anyway. Today, many movies about big-time 
thieves are postmodern movies for decadent imperialist country 
parasites. It's not an easy shot when it comes to thinking about such 
movies and repression.

The jet fight footage is from a previous Godzilla movie, and there is 
a certain story behind the fight in the movie of origin. However, the 
markings on the jets are difficult to see, and what stands out most 
is the visual of Godzilla's wiping out a relentless stream of 
advanced fighter jets which many Amerikan children could have taken 
for U.$. forces or vaguely European, if not United Nations, forces. 
It is easily one of the most visually interesting parts of the dream 
scenes, but this reviewer can imagine its being removed for a U.$. 
release. It was not. No other armed forces appear in "Godzilla's 
Revenge." Faces aren't attached to the fighter jets. Japanese people 
are shown neither attacking nor fleeing Godzilla.

Even leaving aside the anti-Amerikan or anti-Western potential of 
"Godzilla's Revenge," the idea of supporting one's police but not the 
military of one's own country is good for First World nations at this 
time, though less so for the Third World. The First World is not 
about to have some revolutionary uprising suppressed by either police 
or soldiers, and most of the pressure against war does not come from 
First World street protests. (This reviewer would be more suspicious 
of a message to support a First World spy agency but not First World 
militaries.) At the same as saying this, while the First World has a 
bourgeois majority, First World people can be expected to neither get 
rid their own countries' militaries and overthrow their governments, 
nor build their militaries to attack the United $tates. International 
united fronts against the United $tates that include some First World 
nations are at a low level right now. Anti-militarism will have a 
role to play in the land of the First World for some time.

This reviewer discusses the movie's relevance to the present because, 
besides recent video releases of "Godzilla's Revenge," the people who 
watched "Godzilla's Revenge" as children in 1971 are still around and 
will be for decades. Obviously, the G-rating audience of 1971 cannot 
be expected to have opposed militarism effectively, even though 
children are oppressed by patriarchy and the oppressed in general 
resist.

Though he offers a suggestion for improving the computer made by his 
toy-maker neighbor, Ichiro has a 'yuck' reaction to a romantic scene 
on television and turns it off. Instead of watching television, he 
uses his imagination and ends up dreaming about a conflict between 
Godzilla and jets that ruin the ground with their weapons. Godzilla 
wipes the warplanes out. Ecologically destructive U.$. nuclear 
testing led to the first "Godzilla," but ecological destruction in 
various places via U.$. warplanes is another reality, not just 
something in a movie. This reviewer sees some environmentalist 
potential in "Godzilla's Revenge," in which destroying First World 
arms appears as a response to ecological destruction.

Outwardly, "Godzilla's Revenge" is an individualist story about 
bullying. Most thinking about bullying among children in the First 
World is not progressive and is related to discussions of juvenile 
delinquency, psychology, and childrearing and humyn development from 
a Liberal perspective. However, there is a twist in the ending of the 
movie that deflates some of the seriousness of the anti-bullying 
message, and Godzilla's son Minilla learns to stand up to bullies 
partly by watching his father kick the butt of the fighter jets. As 
Iran president Mahmoud Ahmadinejad recently suggested, Amerikans are 
"warmongers, occupiers, terrorists and bullies."

Some have said that "Godzilla's Revenge" raises class issues. Ichiro 
is a latchkey child because his parents have to work in the evening. 
Ichiro accepts this and ends up being taken care of by the police 
(after taking care of himself) and his self-employed neighbor. This 
reviewer actually sees a theme of class conciliation found in other 
Japanese movies of the time. MIWS opposes the idea of class 
conciliation for reasons different than those of the majority of 
"Marxists." It's not that MIWS assumes that most Japanese workers are 
exploited as many pseudo-Marxists would, and that revolutionary 
struggle by Japanese workers is held back by false ideas. Rather, 
class conciliation in imperialist countries is nationalism of 
different exploiting classes and leads to further aggression against 
oppressed nations. The dynamics of both class conciliation and class 
conflict within imperialist nations today lead to repression and a 
push for more super-profit. In the United $tates, class conciliation 
manifests as workers of internal oppressed nations and Euro-Amerikan 
workers, for example, uniting for war on proletarian Muslims. In 
opposing class conciliation, genuine communists do not necessarily 
favor the bourgeois labor aristocracy, the "working class," of a 
First World nation over its imperialist class in a struggle.

One difference between "Godzilla's Revenge" and the Japanese version 
that this reviewer did notice is that the toy-maker in "Godzilla's 
Revenge" explaining Ichiro's imaginary monster friend to journalists 
says that Minilla is to Ichiro what adults' heroes are to adults, 
whereas in the original movie the toy-maker compares Minilla to God 
for adults, which could be offensive to people who believe in a god. 
Those supporting atheism but who are not scientific communists may 
object. The proletariat is not a class in any First World nation 
today. Despite the fantasy of counterrevolutionary "Marxists" in the 
First World that Amerikans in New York led by Bill Maher could be 
more advanced and dangerous to imperialism than people in the Third 
World with strong religious heritages already dying in the struggle 
against U.$. imperialism, no party of an exploiter class in a First 
World nation is going to lead revolution, let alone on a world scale.

In the release year of the Japanese original, the statement "You 
don't need a weatherman to know which way the wind blows" appeared. 
Despite major limitations, it was one of the most advanced products 
to come from a white organization. The days of revolutionary 
Euro-Amerikan organizations are gone. Any opposition to U.$. 
interests by Amerikans is even more likely to take forms other than 
carrying out armed struggle against the United $tates themselves or 
directly supporting those who do. "Godzilla's Revenge" is a benchmark 
by which other children's movies may be compared. Because of their 
young audience, the impact of children's movies may show up in the 
future. If a movie like "Godzilla's Revenge" cannot be made for 
mainstream distribution today and movies like "FernGully: The Last 
Rainforest" (1992), "Bambi" (1942) and "Finding Nemo" (2003) are the 
extent of what there is for environmental messages for children, that 
suggests what is possible politically in the West now and to some 
extent the political development of Amerikans who are now children.

Militarism is not without an aspect of childishness in the United 
$tates. The U.$. military makes recruiting video games for children, 
and countless other games, and movies, serve the same function in 
slightly less obvious ways and support wars in other ways. So, 
"Godzilla's Revenge" should not be dismissed out of hand for being 
PG- or even G-rating material. At the same time, one cannot expect 
too much from either First World filmmakers or their oppressor 
audiences. In the United $tates, it is possible to have more 
militarism and less militarism, but not a "revolutionary" movement 
leading a majority anywhere in the United $tates, unless that 
movement is revisionist or social-fascist. There are no openly 
revolutionary anti-Amerikan movies that will have a good impact on 
many Amerikans, that is, if they watch them. Given a choice between 
having more "Barney" or "Teletubbies," and having more militarist 
video games in the First World, this reviewer would prefer "Barney" 
and "Teletubbies."

About | Home | Theory | Reviews | Document Archive | What's New?